<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Waving Buh-Bye to the Wave: One POV Regarding the End of Google Wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clearverve.com/2010/08/09/waving-buh-bye-to-the-wave-one-pov-regarding-the-end-of-google-wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clearverve.com/2010/08/09/waving-buh-bye-to-the-wave-one-pov-regarding-the-end-of-google-wave/</link>
	<description>Promise Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 02:45:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.clearverve.com/2010/08/09/waving-buh-bye-to-the-wave-one-pov-regarding-the-end-of-google-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 15:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clearverve.com/?p=702#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I was the biggest Google Wave skeptic there was, until I saw an actual demo from Google Wave engineers and was able to ask them questions. Once I figured out a PURPOSE for Wave, it was an incredibly valuable tool. But only in the context of group projects. I used it for my @MarquetteMBA study group (with people who have never even heard of it before we started) and without Wave, there&#039;s no way the SaveTeecycle.org fundraiser would have been able to come together. 

I think people just didn&#039;t know what to DO with Wave, and they got frustrated when it didn&#039;t act like Facebook or Twitter. It didn&#039;t help that it was really buggy in the beginning, too. So people abandoned it, and missed out on potential to use it as a tool for work. 

I think it was actually ahead of their time. I&#039;m sure Google Wave will always be a punchline like Friendster, but soon enough someone else will come along (Facebook?) with a tool that&#039;s very similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was the biggest Google Wave skeptic there was, until I saw an actual demo from Google Wave engineers and was able to ask them questions. Once I figured out a PURPOSE for Wave, it was an incredibly valuable tool. But only in the context of group projects. I used it for my @MarquetteMBA study group (with people who have never even heard of it before we started) and without Wave, there&#8217;s no way the SaveTeecycle.org fundraiser would have been able to come together. </p>
<p>I think people just didn&#8217;t know what to DO with Wave, and they got frustrated when it didn&#8217;t act like Facebook or Twitter. It didn&#8217;t help that it was really buggy in the beginning, too. So people abandoned it, and missed out on potential to use it as a tool for work. </p>
<p>I think it was actually ahead of their time. I&#8217;m sure Google Wave will always be a punchline like Friendster, but soon enough someone else will come along (Facebook?) with a tool that&#8217;s very similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

